Cross-Border Child Abduction and the Hague Convention

Cross-Border Child Abduction and the Hague Convention – Insights from FC v MS [2025] EWHC 1030 (Fam)
In the recent High Court decision of FC v MS [2025] EWHC 1030 (Fam), the court addressed the complexities of international child abduction under the 1980 Hague Convention. The case involved a father's application for the summary return of his 7-year-old son, DC, to the Republic of Ireland, following the child's removal to England by his mother, MS.
Background
DC was born and raised in Ireland, where both parents resided. In June 2024, MS relocated to England with DC and another child, citing concerns over the father's alleged abusive behaviour, substance misuse, and criminal history. The father, FC, contested the removal and sought DC's return under the Hague Convention, asserting that the child was wrongfully removed from his habitual residence.
Legal Framework
The 1980 Hague Convention aims to protect children from international abduction by providing a mechanism for their prompt return to their country of habitual residence. Under Article 13(b) of the Convention, a court may refuse to order the return of a child if it is established that returning the child would expose them to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm.
Court's Analysis
The court examined the mother's defenses under Article 13(b), focusing on the alleged risks posed by the father's behaviour and the potential impact on DC's well-being. Evidence presented included:
- Testimony from Dr. Ratnam, assessing MS's mental health and the potential consequences of returning to Ireland.
- Reports from social worker Ms. Demery, indicating that DC expressed a desire to return to Ireland and that no immediate risk to him was identified.
The court concluded that while concerns existed regarding both parents' past behaviours, the evidence did not meet the threshold of "grave risk" required under Article 13(b). Protective measures available in Ireland were deemed sufficient to mitigate potential risks.
Outcome
The court ordered the return of DC to the Republic of Ireland, emphasizing the importance of upholding international agreements to deter child abduction. Arrangements were made for DC's re-enrolment in school and for maintaining contact with his mother through appropriate means.
Implications
This case underscores the challenges courts face in balancing the objectives of the Hague Convention with the individual circumstances of each case. It highlights the necessity for substantial evidence when invoking exceptions to the Convention's mandate for the prompt return of abducted children.
For family law advice and family court representation contact Stephanie Heijdra Family Barrister via sheijdra@winvolvedlegal.co.uk or 02071014682









